Class actions

Class actions are procedures in which various parties work together to seek justice. This is often the case in mass claims, which can be claims relating to economic loss (for instance stock exchange losses on shares) but can also immaterial (or non-economic) loss cases (such as environmental measures). Although class actions on mass claims are a normal part of American culture, they are still rare in the Netherlands.

bureau Brandeis’ class action team boasts specialists in corporate law, class actions and mass claims settlement and often works with interest groups and class action claim funders. Our team is also active in class actions which are mainly based in the US but which have their effects in the Netherlands as well. For instance when witnesses need to give testimony here or when Dutch parties, who have suffered damage, need legal assistance.

We are or have been involved in the following mass claim cases, among others:

  • Fortis Bank, as a result of incorrect information provided by Fortis in 2007 and 2008 about its financial risks as result of holding large investment portfolios in American subprime products;
  • the Shell settlement, for shareholders who suffered damage as a result of the sharp fall of the Shell shares after it came out that Shell’s oil and gas reserves had been strongly overestimated and its actual oil and gas reserves turned out to be much lower than expected;
  • the Dexia affair about liability for financial products;
  • the ABP pension fund and others as claimants against the American pharmaceutical company Merck in regard to investment losses suffered as a result of the belated disclosure of price-sensitive information;
  • the Libor affair, about how the Libor and Euribor interest rates were manipulated by several banks including Rabobank.

bureau Brandeis’ attorneys have also been involved in class actions of an idealistic nature, such as the case about the right of the Dutch government to exchange data with the American security services (Civilians against Plasterk) and the question of whether the mayor of Amsterdam has the authority to set conditions on Dutch folklore (Zwarte Piet/ Black Peter claims).

Mass claims can be made when a large number of injured parties suffer the same type of economic loss through one or a small number of responsible parties in cases with the same or similar legal or factual questions. These claims might be the result of shareholders in a stock exchange fund being misled, the withholding of information about technical defects in consumer products which have been sold in large numbers, or collective damages from parties who made a profit as a result of illegal price-fixing (cartels).

The introduction of the Class Action (Financial Settlement) Act (WCAM) in 2005 means that mass damages claims can now be settled collectively and that these settlements can be declared binding by the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. By declaring a settlement binding, the court ensures that injured parties who were not part of the settlement itself, may also derive rights under it. Should an injured party not wish to be bound by the settlement he may indicate this within a set period of time, a so-called opt out.

The international relevance of the Netherlands as a class action settlement country has increased over the last few years. The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled, in its so-called Converium decision, that just a few reference points with the Dutch jurisdiction are sufficient to make a collective settlement under the WCAM binding on all injured parties throughout Europe. After the Morrison judgment (Morrison v. National Australian Bank) in particular, a decision by the American Supreme Court which makes it harder to litigate class action claims in the US against companies not based in the US, we expect the number of class actions in the Netherlands to increase.

bureau Brandeis’ class action team is led by Frank Peters. Frank Peters is involved in various American and Dutch class actions and frequently gives lectures on the protection of institutional investors and the manipulation of the financial markets through LIBOR and EURIBOR rates.

Our specialists

Frank Peters

Frank Peters is partner of bureau Brandeis. He is a corporate and securities litigator – experienced in (international) litigation and advising in relation to (potentially) litigious situations and arbitrations. Frank Peters is a member of…

Full profile

Jozua van der Beek

Jozua is partner at bureau Brandeis. He litigates before the Supreme Court in civil cases. In corporate and commercial litigation cases he also litigates before the lower courts. In addition, Jozua establishes international collective settlements…

Full profile

Michelle Krekels

Michelle is an associate with bureau Brandeis. She specializes in corporate litigation. Her professional focus is on legal disputes between (partners of) corporations, joint ventures and other partnerships. Michelle is experienced in shareholder disputes, disputes…

Full profile
Cartel damages litigation – quarterly reports

Cartel Damages Litigation – Quarterly Report III of 2019

Hans Bousie & Louis Berger & Sophie van Everdingen & Bas Braeken & Jade Versteeg & Nathan van der Raaij & Tessel Bossen / 30 Dec 2019

This is the third bureau Brandeis quarterly report of 2019 on the developments in the area of cartel damage litigation. You may download our quarterly report here. Would you like to receive the next edition…

Cartel damages litigation – quarterly reports

Cartel Damages Litigation – Quarterly Report I of 2019

Hans Bousie & Louis Berger & Bas Braeken & Sophie van Everdingen & Nathan van der Raaij & Tessel Bossen / 22 Oct 2019

This is the first bureau Brandeis quarterly report of 2019 on the developments in the area of cartel damage litigation. You may download our quarterly report here. Would you like to receive the next edition…

Read all articles


- Louis Brandeis